|
Mercury
Toxicity –
How
You May Already Have It
and Not Even Know It (Part 2)
(This is a continuation
of an article published in the
April 2004 edition of NC Journal for Women.)
The specialty of
metal toxicology dates back to the 1930’s
when the first drugs were developed that would bind metals
such as lead, arsenic, and cadmium. These
drugs would chelate, or bind,
to these metals that were attached to the
tissues of patients who were symptomatic from exposure to
toxic metals. As a result, some remarkable health benefits
were noted.
These early chelating drugs were not
as effective in the removal of mercury.
However, in the 1950’s, better drugs were developed
that had a stronger affinity for mercury. It was not until
the 1980’s that a new
drug, DMPS, became more widely
used in the diagnosis and treatment of mercury toxicity.
Since then, tremendous numbers of research articles have
been published in mainstream medical journals demonstrating
the safety and effectiveness of these drugs in heavy
metal diseases. And it is universally acknowledged
that Chelation Therapy
is the scientifically valid and accepted method of treating
heavy metal toxicity including mercury toxicity. Chelation,
however, is not an exact science.
The amount of heavy metals being removed
does not change in a linear
fashion. One test may show a very high level
of one metal, the next test show very lows levels, while
yet another may be very high. This can change
continuously based on the relative concentration of the
metals in our tissues. Individual variability
is also significant, making the interpretation of test results
and determination of length of treatment very difficult.
Over time, levels will gradually diminish, correlating with
clinical improvement.
Regardless of the form of chelation used,
there are certain important issues that should be considered:
1. It is critical that FURTHER EXPOSURE
TO MERCURY AND OTHER TOXIC METALS BE REDUCED
AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. Certainly, curtailment
of fish consumption is the first recommendation.
Be especially conscious of tuna,
shark, and swordfish, the fish with the
highest concentrations of mercury. Also, an individual’s
proximity to coal burning electric generating plants
must be considered, as individuals living within 50 miles
of such a facility are definitely inhaling higher quantities
of mercury. It is recommended that those individuals who
have mercury amalgam dental
fillings get these replaced with a nontoxic
material to reduce further exposure from the vapor
produced by chewing and grinding of ones
teeth. This must be done by a biological dentist
who is conscious of the safety precautions necessary when
manipulating mercury from old fillings. It is unsafe and
inappropriate for a conventional dentist to remove multiple
amalgam fillings without the use of procedures to limit
further intoxication from the mercury that is being removed.
2. It is critical that a person’s
nutritional status
be at an optimal level prior to performing any chelating
treatments. Mineral status is especially important before
and during chelation.
3. Minerals should be taken in appropriate
doses during the course of treatment, but never
on the actual day that chelators are being given.
Avoid copper, zinc, and molybdenum, as well as selenium
in high concentrations as they will bind to mercury, rendering
it less toxic and non-chelatable.
There are different forms of chelating drugs
that are used to treat mercury toxicity: DMPS, DMSA, and
EDTA. DMPS is given either intravenously (can be infused
in about 15 minutes and used either alone or in combination
with EDTA) or orally. DMSA is used primarily in children
and EDTA is administered only through IV,
though newer forms are being developed for oral and suppository
administration.
In conclusion, the evidence exists –
both in scientific journal publications and through years
of clinical experience by physicians from around the world
– that heavy metal toxicity, and specifically mercury,
is the cause of numerous chronic
degenerative diseases and that chelating
treatments that remove these toxins can result in significant
health improvements.
In the face of the increasing incidence
of such diseases and their clear link to mercury toxicity,
we must acknowledge this as a public health crisis
and do everything possible to reduce
the quantity of mercury that enters our environment
and ultimately our bodies, particularly the 150+
year practice of using amalgam fillings in dentistry
and the 60+ year history of using thimerosol (a mercury-based
preservative) in the vaccines given to children and adults.
It is crucial that government place this at its highest
priority and tightens controls on emissions from
power plants, while quickly transitioning to alternate
fuel sources that do not produce this toxic by product.
This poisoning of our people has to stop. |